Evaluating Business Communication Paper Assignment

Evaluating Business Communication Paper - Assignment Example The various communication to managerial personnel and to the members of the accounting department were appropriate for the intended audience. The memo from John, the Accounting Team representative was also expected by the CEO, William. The leadership roles and styles in the scenario affectively established the kind of tone, the structure of the correspondence, and the manner by which the messages would be written. The memo between managers are formal and expected to be structured in a language that is familiar to personnel of managerial position. Likewise, the memo from John to the CEO aimed to be structured in a formal tone, but could still be improved. As briefly noted above, the memo sent by John to the CEO could be improved. The tone should be formal. Likewise, the entire communique should have been proofread extensively to be free from errors. From the memo that was written by John to the CEO, it was evident that there were grammatical errors (the way JJJ Company was written where the word Company was sometimes written in full, sometimes abbreviated, and at times, the abbreviated ‘Co.’ was even written in lower case). In addition, there were some statements that should not have been included (‘Beth requested all financial reports even though some of them were not required’) as the implication, with the rest of the information in the third paragraph, would be immaterial for the CEO. Also, the last statement which says: ‘If you have any questions, please contact me’ could still be improved as the structure seemed to be an order to the CEO which is not appropriate. The sender could have said, ‘If there are further queries in the disclosed information, I would be more than willing to relay it at your most convenient time’. In other correspondences, the memos were structured with some aspects similar to a business

Nursing In Critical Care Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Nursing In Critical Care - Case Study Example Patients benefit from such practices and procedures; however, there are instances when these processes and procedures are not adequately carried out during the practice. In the emergency department, critically ill patients are often encountered and they often end up being referred to the intensive care unit. Assessments in the emergency unit are carried out on these patients. Such processes yield essential information pertinent to the patient’s care. After such data is gathered and the patient is referred to the ICU staff, information is then handed over to the ICU staff. In some instances, however, the information handed over is incomplete or is not adequately explained to the nurses in the ICU. Such a situation represents a failure of communication between the two nursing teams. In some instances, essential information is not turned over to the critical care nurses because the focus seems to be on the critical condition of the patient. Aside from incomplete information relay ed, there also seems to be a lack of clarity on the data transmitted during the handover process. The handover has been highlighted in the emergency unit I am currently working with as an important process. I have been taught that it can influence the quality and continuity of patient care. Even with these instructions, however, there are still many instances when there are issues and incomplete data transmitted during the handover process. Based on these considerations, it is safe to assume that there are gaps in our current knowledge and practice, especially in terms of patient handover to intensive care nurses. This paper shall seek to establish the possible factors affecting an effective handover process and the different gaps and issues seen in the practice and the application of this procedure.